Which statement is true about a 2x2 matrix A regarding invertibility?

Boost your skills in A Level Further Mathematics Core Pure. Study with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each question is followed by hints and explanations. Get prepared for your exam with confidence!

Multiple Choice

Which statement is true about a 2x2 matrix A regarding invertibility?

Explanation:
A square matrix is invertible exactly when its determinant is nonzero. For a 2x2 matrix A = [a b; c d], the determinant is ad − bc. If this value is not zero, A has an inverse (and you can find it as (1/(ad − bc)) [d −b; −c a]); the columns are linearly independent, so the transformation is reversible. If ad − bc = 0, the transformation collapses a dimension, the matrix is singular, and no inverse exists. So the statement that A is invertible iff det(A) ≠ 0 is the correct criterion. The other ideas don’t determine invertibility: a zero determinant is the sign it’s not invertible, not invertible; the trace can be zero even for invertible matrices (for instance [0 1; −1 0] has trace zero but det 1 and is invertible); and invertible matrices have full rank, not less than 2.

A square matrix is invertible exactly when its determinant is nonzero. For a 2x2 matrix A = [a b; c d], the determinant is ad − bc. If this value is not zero, A has an inverse (and you can find it as (1/(ad − bc)) [d −b; −c a]); the columns are linearly independent, so the transformation is reversible. If ad − bc = 0, the transformation collapses a dimension, the matrix is singular, and no inverse exists.

So the statement that A is invertible iff det(A) ≠ 0 is the correct criterion. The other ideas don’t determine invertibility: a zero determinant is the sign it’s not invertible, not invertible; the trace can be zero even for invertible matrices (for instance [0 1; −1 0] has trace zero but det 1 and is invertible); and invertible matrices have full rank, not less than 2.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy